Skip to content


The truth, nothing but the truth

Standard Bank, Adderley St, Cape Town

Standard Bank Cape Town after a horrific rating from Fitch

Lees dit en kom agter wat aan die gang is mense.  Die banke is wankelende blokkies op n bankrot bord. Kyk hoe word Fitch se gradering aangebied. Asof dit iets positiefs is. Asof dit “affirm” – want “affirm” is mos sterk ne?

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

July 22 – Fitch Ratings has affirmed The Standard Bank of South (SBR002J.J)  Africa Limited’s (SBSA) ratings. At the same time, the agency has assigned Long-term foreign and local currency IDRs of ‘BBB+’, Short-term IDR of ‘F2’ and a Support Rating Floor of ‘NF’ (No Floor) to its parent company Standard Bank Group Limited (SBG).

Fitch has also affirmed SBG’s Short-term National, Viability and Support

Ratings. The Outlooks on the Long-term ratings of both entities are Stable. A full rating breakdown is at the end of this comment. The ratings of both entities reflect SBSA’s strong South African franchise, consistent core profitability and acceptable levels of core capitalisation. These features are balanced by weakened asset quality trends which may persist in the medium term. SBSA’s ratings also reflect the risks associated with SBG’s international emerging market activities given the integrated nature of the global banking business. SBG’s Viability Rating is equalised with SBSA’s in light of consolidated supervision by the South African Reserve Bank, low levels of double leverage at the holding company and high levels of integration across group entities. Earnings improved in 2010 due to a significant improvement in insurance profits from 54%-owned insurance subsidiary, Liberty Group Limited (Liberty) following a return to stable levels of insurance income and a positive investment performance. Although earnings from banking activities reduced by 13.8%, the improved group performance was supported by lower levels of impairment charges. Fitch expects SBG’s 2011 earnings to be better than those reported in 2010, driven by further reductions in impairment charges although revenue growth is expected to remain subdued. Given the difficult operating environment, management has taken steps to manage the group’s operating costs. Rapid asset quality deterioration has been a feature over the past three years, particularly in secured retail lending and more recently in the group’s international corporate exposures. The trend of weakening asset quality slowed considerably in 2010, and appears to havepeaked. Restructuring, write-offs and recoveries contributed to an improved NPL ratio of 7.1% at end-2010 (end-2009: 7.9%), despite the contracting loan book. Coverage remained a low 40.1% (end-2009: 38.6%). The reliance on collateral and the challenges to realising it could mean additional provisions are required in SBG’s international book.SBG has actively used loan renegotiation as a risk-management tool. Capitalisation is considered to be acceptable. High levels of Tier 1 are appropriate in view of the high proportion of group net assets employed outside South Africa and low levels of loan-loss reserve coverage. Negative rating pressure could result if capital indicators were to deteriorate from current levels. SBG is South Africa’s largest banking group.

In South Africa it owns SBSA and controls Liberty, while internationally it owns a network of emerging market-focused businesses mainly aimed at linking Africa to other large emerging markets. The group has a strategic partnership with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), which is a 20% shareholder in SBG.

The rating actions are as follows:


Long-term foreign currency IDR: affirmed at ‘BBB+’; Outlook Stable

Long-term local currency IDR: affirmed at ‘BBB+’; Outlook Stable

Short-term foreign currency IDR: affirmed at ‘F2’

Viability Rating: affirmed at ‘bbb+’

Individual Rating: affirmed at ‘C’

Support Rating: affirmed at ‘2’

Support Rating Floor: affirmed at ‘BBB-‘

National Long-term rating: affirmed at ‘AA(zaf)’; Outlook Stable

National Short-term rating: affirmed at ‘F1+(zaf)’

Senior unsecured debt: affirmed at ‘BBB+’/’F2’


Long-term foreign currency IDR: assigned at ‘BBB+’; Outlook Stable

Long-term local currency IDR: assigned at ‘BBB+’; Outlook Stable

Short-term foreign currency IDR: assigned at ‘F2’

National Short-term rating: affirmed at ‘F1+(zaf)’

Viability Rating: affirmed at ‘bbb+’

Individual Rating: affirmed at ‘C’

Support Rating: affirmed at ‘5’

Support Rating Floor: assigned at ‘NF’

Long-term credit ratings

Fitch Ratings’ long-term credit ratings are assigned on an alphabetic scale from ‘AAA’ to ‘D’, first introduced in 1924 and later adopted and licensed by S&P. (Moody’s also uses a similar scale, but names the categories differently.) Like S&P, Fitch also uses intermediate +/- modifiers for each category between AA and CCC (e.g., AA+, AA, AA-, A+, A, A-, BBB+, BBB, BBB-, etc.).

Investment grade

  • AAA  : the best quality companies, reliable and stable
  • AA  : quality companies, a bit higher risk than AAA
  • A  : economic situation can affect finance
  • BBB  : medium class companies, which are satisfactory at the moment

Non-investment grade

  • BB  : more prone to changes in the economy
  • B  : financial situation varies noticeably
  • CCC  : currently vulnerable and dependent on favorable economic conditions to meet its commitments
  • CC  : highly vulnerable, very speculative bonds
  • C  : highly vulnerable, perhaps in bankruptcy or in arrears but still continuing to pay out on obligations
  • D  : has defaulted on obligations and Fitch believes that it will generally default on most or all obligations
  • NR  : not publicly rated

Short-term credit ratings

Fitch’s short-term ratings indicate the potential level of default within a 12-month period.

  • F1+  : best quality grade, indicating exceptionally strong capacity of obligor to meet its financial commitment
  • F1  : best quality grade, indicating strong capacity of obligor to meet its financial commitment
  • F2  : good quality grade with satisfactory capacity of obligor to meet its financial commitment
  • F3  : fair quality grade with adequate capacity of obligor to meet its financial commitment but near term adverse conditions could impact the obligor’s commitments
  • B  : of speculative nature and obligor has minimal capacity to meet its commitment and vulnerability to short term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions
  • C  : possibility of default is high and the financial commitment of the obligor are dependent upon sustained, favourable business and economic conditions
  • D  : the obligor is in default as it has failed on its financial commitments.

via TEXT-Fitch affirms Standard Bank of South Africa | Reuters.


Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: